- Let's Buy a Biz!
- Posts
- Turning SharkNinja $15B into GE 2.0
Turning SharkNinja $15B into GE 2.0
SharkNinja is suffering from âInstant Pot Syndrome,â so we need to roll up our sleeves and streamline the heck out of this biz. Plus why the week after the Super Bowl is a great time to run a promo.

đ§ The Takeaways
Today, weâre taking an early activist stake in SharkNinja to stop this biz from going to the dark side to scale it from $15B -> $50B.
Stop the over-hiring creep.
Get out of all these garbage categories.
Actually do more R&D.
+ How to arbitrage the Super Bowl Afterglow.
Letâs Community - The Post Super Bowl Arbitrage

The Super Bowl is a great moment to zig when everyone else is zagging.
The massive brands just blew their H1 budgets on the SB. The world will be talking about it all week.
Time to newsjack.
If you can wedge an offer or promo into the SB chatter (/Valentineâs Day), youâll be able to surf the big brandsâ ad spend when everyone else is pulling back. The inventory wonât disappear but the advertisers will.
As youâre watching the game tonight think about where you can enter the conversation. Great time as CPMs go down, but wallets stay out.
Letâs Examine This Biz
Note: As always, none of what follows is legal, tax, investing, financial, or any other sort of advice. Iâm not a current investor in Sonos. And I was never here đ.
SharkNinja, the 5-star home appliance company famous for the (Shark - vacuums + hair dryers and Ninja kitchen appliances), is grossly overvalued as they overextend the brand and crush their profitability.
Trading at $112.17/share
$15.7B market cap (43x P/E Ratio)
+300% since its 2023 IPO.
Itâs trading on hype instead of future earnings.
Today, weâre going to take an activist stake and get this biz back on the right track toward becoming a $50B household appliances juggernaut.
Financial Summary
2023 Financial Statements (YoY Comparison)
Sales: $4.2B (+14%) đ
Gross Profits: $1.9B (+35%) đ¤¤
OPEX: $1.5B (+41%) đ
Net Income: $167m (-28%) đŤ¤
TLDR Analysis: Scaling is too expensive
Gross Margins jumped 7% YoY đ¤¤
The biz is making less profits ($$ and %) as it scales đ¤¨
G&A jumped 54% YoY! đ
1 thing to keep in mind: they went public in the same year, so some of this increase is from 1x IPO stock grants, but still 54% is too big of a G&A increase.
The layers theyâre adding on to grow Revenue will be their downfall. Within 5 years this biz will be announcing:
Layoffs
Clearance sales on abandoned categories.
Potentially splitting up this biz.
Iâm getting real Instant Pot vibes here.
Letâs Fix This Biz!
3 ways Iâd save this biz from itself and keep it on a healthy path to $50B:
1) Cut G&A
I know this is counterintuitive for a biz thatâs scaling and seems to be crushing, but SG&A is growing too quickly, which erases the Gross Margin gains they made from keeping COGS under control.
No one likes to talk about this, but brands always overhire with scale because they think bigger Rev requires more heads.
It doesnât.
The beauty of Consumer brands is how infinitely scalable they are.

The long and short of it: SharkNinja is overhiring. Over 2 years, Sales Grew 14%; Headcount grew 50%.
The math ainât mathing. Time to fix that.
Takeaway: Donât hire when it feels like youâre getting punched in the face. Wait til your nose is bleeding.
2) Donât get lost in your own hype

No one at SharkNinja is saying no to new product ideas. If they are, I canât imagine what projects are getting rejected.
Shark became famous for the "no loss of suction" vacuums.
Whyâs Shark selling Red Light masks or air purifiers?
Ninja is famous for Air fryers.
Whyâs Ninja selling Coolers, drinkware and cookware?
Itâs the same problem that post-Steve-Jobs Apple has.
Thereâs no curator killing the thousand okay/good projects to focus on the 1-2 world-changing ones.
For a biz that prides themselves on producing anything & everything, they need to remember:
If you design something for everyone, you end up designing it for no one.
A huge catalog with mostly mid products is a profitability killer.
A small catalog of category defining ones is how you change the world.
Takeaway: Stick to your core. Donât believe you can produce everything for everyone.
3) The most fascinating part of their P&LâŚ
For a brand that slaps innovation on every piece of marketing material they donât spend that much money on innovation.
R&D is 6% of Rev, which is the definition of âaverage.â
R&D is both a spread of seeds far and wide + a concentrated bet department. Test 100s to find the 1 thing that works, then go all in on making it the best possible thing.
They do have incredibly innovative products, but are they betting the farm on dominating in those categories?

And how many knockoffs of popular competitors will keep this biz afloat? They arenât investing enough money into making their products the best products ever. Eventually cloning everyone will catch up with them.
If SharkNinja really wanted to win theyâd focus all of their R&D + Marketing on putting Dyson out of biz.
Takeaway: Once you find a hit, throw 90% of R&D into making it the best.
Final Thought
I honestly have no idea what the hype is all about.
They arenât growing that quickly.
They arenât that profitable.
Most of their products arenât that unique or cheap.

Is this really the new standard for Consumer public market performance?
Iâve met with a handful of kinda-growing barely profitable bizs that would love to trade at 40x their earnings.
Short-term Iâll probably be wrong here. This biz seems to have momentum + a great narrative on their side, that investors are rallying behind.
But honestly I donât get it.
They have some amazing products consumers love. But the gems are underneath too much weight.
This could be a great consumer biz that could probably spawn off 3-4 more divisions to become the modern day GE.
But today, the leadership sees money on the table and is clearly grabbing it in whatever trend pops up.
Also know as: the perfect way to ruin a brand.
How was today's Newsletter |
Reply